Roadster 18650 · Generation 2
Roadster 3.0 (R80)
R80[1]A hand-built 80 kWh retrofit that lifted the original Roadster to about 340 miles of range.
- Gross capacity
- 80 kWh
- Usable capacity
- Unknown
- Cells
- Unknown
- Pack mass
- Unknown
Pack · top view
Module layout unverified
- Cell supplier
- Undisclosed
- Cell
- Roadster 18650 cell
- Vehicles
- Roadster
- Built at
- Not documented
About this pack
Tesla announced the Roadster 3.0 upgrade in late 2014 and began fitting it in 2016. The retrofit replaced the original pack with one Tesla described as roughly 80 kWh, more than 40% above the original. Owners nicknamed it R80.
Tesla's early announcement targeted about 70 kWh using 'a new cell that has 31% more energy than the original Roadster cell'. The pack that shipped came in at around 80 kWh.
Specifications
Pack data, value by value
- Manufacturer-confirmed
- Documented
- Community-reported
- Estimated
Every value shows its evidence level and sources. “Unknown” means no source we trust has published it. We never fill gaps with assumptions.
- Usable capacityEnergy available 100% → 0%
- Unknown
- Chemistry
- Unknown
- Cell format
- Unknown
Tesla said the new pack fits the original package; the cell format was not stated in the sources reviewed.
- Cell supplier
- Unknown
Tesla described 'a new cell' with 31% more energy than the original but did not name the supplier.
- Cell count
- Unknown
- ConfigurationSeries × parallel
- Unknown
- Modules
- Unknown
- Nominal voltage
- Unknown
- Architecture
- Unknown
- Pack mass
- Unknown
- Energy densityPack level
- Unknown
Requires both pack mass and capacity.
- Structural pack
- NoEstimated
Drop-in replacement for the original pack.
- Peak DC charging
- Unknown
The cell
Roadster 18650 cell
A commodity 18650 cell of the kind used in laptops, chosen because it was readily available and affordable in 2008. Tesla described modifying the cells for automotive use.
Cell data
- Dimensions
18650 = 18 mm diameter, 65 mm length.
- Capacity
- Disputed
Sources report different values. None is marked as correct:
- 2.2 Ah[]
- Nominal voltage
- Unknown
- Energy per cell
- Unknown
- Chemistry
- Unknown
Commercially available laptop-class lithium-ion cells; the cathode chemistry was not published.
Capacity in context
Gross capacity of every documented pack. Hatched bars are disputed ranges; packs with unknown capacity are omitted.
- Cybertruck 4680123
- Model S/X 100103
- Model S/X 2021+100
- Model S/X 9090
- LG 5N88.2
- Model S 8585
- LG 5M84.7
- Panasonic 3L82.1
- Roadster 3.0 (R80)80
- Tesla 8L79
- LG 5L78.8
- Panasonic 377.8
- Model S/X 7575
- LG 5C74.5
- Tesla 4680 Structural (Model Y)69
- CATL 6M62.5
- CATL 6L60
- BYD 7C55–60 (disputed)
- CATL 6C55
- Panasonic 1L55
- Panasonic 1C53.1
- Roadster ESS53
Applications
Where this pack is installed
Each row is a documented link between this pack and a vehicle variant, with its factory, period and evidence. A variant may also appear with other packs.
Performance
Charging, advantages and tradeoffs
Peak DC charging
Unknown
No verified charging curve for this pack is in the database yet. Curves vary with temperature, state of charge and software, so we only publish curves backed by repeatable measurements.
Identification
How to tell if your car has it
- This is a retrofit, not a factory option. Only Tesla service records can confirm whether a given Roadster received it.
- The part number on the high-voltage battery label and Tesla service records are definitive. A VIN alone does not encode the cell supplier or pack code.
History
Lineage in the Roadster 18650 family
The original Roadster's energy storage system wired 6,831 commodity 18650 cells into eleven sheets. A hand-built upgrade pack followed in 2016.
Roadster 3.0 upgrade arrives
A hand-built pack of roughly 80 kWh lifts the original Roadster to about 340 miles of range.
Related packs
Sources
2 references
- [1]Tesla Roadster 3.0 battery upgrade (R80)
ElectrekpressPublished 8 Jul 2016Consulted 28 Oct 2026Pending direct review
- [2]Tesla Roadster 3.0 Update Finally Arrives With 340-Mile Range
AutoGuidepressPublished Jul 2016Consulted 28 Oct 2026Pending direct review